Start with the job
Recommendations begin with an explicit scenario. Provider popularity is not the starting point.
Methodology
ProxyClarity is designed to help choose infrastructure without turning missing, stale, promotional or third-party information into fake certainty.
Recommendations begin with an explicit scenario. Provider popularity is not the starting point.
Provider claims, pricing, verification, community signals and ProxyClarity technical measurements are not interchangeable.
Missing evidence remains unknown. It is not silently converted into a failing score.
Version 7 exposes a compact lookup of the exact L0 recommendation corpus: 11,200 scenarios across 14 use cases, five budgets, five traffic bands, four proxy types and eight geographies. The browser does not recompute provider ranking.
Until ProxyClarity runs its own live technical benchmarks, Technical Score remains unavailable and carries no ranking weight. Independent benchmarks do not become ProxyClarity Technical Score.
Provider pages show source-backed, captured-but-unprovenanced, ambiguous and unknown fields. Those statuses describe evidence integrity. They are not a global ranking.
Pricing is displayed from the canonical normalized model only when it has an acceptable public citation. ProxyClarity does not invent missing bulk tiers or extrapolate beyond stored tiers. If a canonical record contains a placeholder/manual citation, the public page holds that citation for review instead of presenting it as a valid source.
Provider verification has Match Score weight 0. Deals have weight 0. Community discovery and qualitative review intelligence are kept distinct from ProxyClarity technical measurement.
Evidence can age. A stale or review-due label is a research-integrity signal and does not automatically subtract ranking points.
Providers and users can submit primary-source corrections to contact@proxyclarity.com. Corrections are reviewed as evidence updates, not ranking requests.